This weekend Sinterklaas arrived in our country again to fill many children's shoes on Christmas Eve. Earlier we wrote that he must comply with the strict safety requirements on the roof, but Santa Claus must also make sure that his activities do not damage the flue pipes of the addresses he visits and can prove it. The fact that things can still go wrong is evident from a ruling by the Roofing Disputes Committee regarding gravel in the flue. Marloes Beeren explains this ruling.
Date: November 22, 2023
Modified January 03, 2024
A roofer had installed a new roof on behalf of a consumer. Some time after completion, the resident reported that he could no longer use his fireplace because the damper was stuck. A camera inspection subsequently revealed that the fireplace's flap was blocked by a gravel column as large as 1.24 meters in the flue. The consumer held the roofer liable for this, but the roofer did not proceed with repairs.
Indeed, the roofer found it unlikely that the gravel had ended up in the flue during his work. After all, according to the roofer, the resident should have heard that gravel ended up in the flue if it happened during the lifting of the new gravel. After all, the resident was home at the time. In addition, the roofing contractor's employees present stated that no gravel fell into the chimney during the hoisting and hoisting of the old and new gravel.
The resident and the roofer did not come to an agreement and asked the Roofing Disputes Committee for an opinion.
The disputes committee appointed an expert who went to look at the roof. The expert confirmed that the 1.24-meter gravel column was the cause of the fireplace valve not working.
In addition, the expert recommended hiring a gravel extraction company to remove the gravel from the flue with a small diameter hose or pipe.
Despite the roofer's objections, the disputes committee still ordered the roofer to pay the repair and investigation costs. The committee found it plausible that the gravel entered the flue during the construction of the new roof. After all, there was no other indication that the gravel might have entered the chimney in some other way. A small amount of gravel could still be caused by birds, but the amount involved was too much for that.
The Disputes Committee's ruling shows that, fortunately, this situation does not happen often. Nevertheless, roofers would do well to cover a chimney while lifting gravel up and down. This relatively simple and inexpensive measure can prevent gravel from ending up in the flue or subsequent discussion about who is responsible.
As a general rule, it is important for roofers to properly survey the existing situation prior to work. This ruling shows once again that a roofing contractor often has "appearances againstthem" when damage to existing parts of a home is reported after work is performed.
In such a case, if the roofer has not properly recorded how he found an existing situation, damage to existing parts will be his responsibility.
Some practical tips to properly record the situation prior to the work:
Are you a roofer being held liable for damages due to your work or do you have questions about recording your work? If so, please contact us.