Date: January 04, 2022
Modified November 14, 2023
Reading time: +/- 2 minutes
Several general conditions in construction have largely similar hidden defect provisions. Under these, a roofer is liable for hidden defects in the work for a period of five years after completion or after the end of the maintenance period. A hidden defect is a defect that the client did not notice before delivery and also should/could not reasonably have discovered during delivery. If a hidden defect occurs in the work, the roofer must, in principle, repair this defect.
An action based on a hidden defect expires with the lapse of five years. That is, a principal must commence proceedings before the Council of Arbitration in construction disputes or the courts within five years of completion or end of the maintenance period to secure his rights based on a hidden defect. What does this mean if a defect occurs after the end of the hidden defect period, but the roofer has already made repairs to the work within that hidden defect period? Is the client then left empty-handed or is the contractor still liable?
It is now settled case law of the Board of Arbitration in construction disputes that a five-year limitation period begins again after the contractor (such as a roofer) has repaired a hidden defect if three conditions are met:
Importantly, any new five-year period applies only to a defect in the repaired work. This means that no new hidden defect period commences for other defects in the original work or for new, similar defects not previously repaired.
We explain this using an example. Suppose a roofer delivers a roof in 2015. In 2018, the client reports a complaint and the roofer makes repairs by replacing EPDM gutter lining. If it is a hidden defect (and the three conditions mentioned above are met), a new five-year hidden defect period begins in 2018. Suppose in 2022 the client complains about the roof again, but this time not about the EPDM gutter cladding. The complaint is about the end tiles that need to be replaced. If this complaint is not related to the repair of the earlier complaint about the EPDM gutter lining, then a new five-year period does not apply. For a new hidden defect, the original five-year period that began after completion in 2015 applies. That term has already expired at the time of the complaint in 2022. Therefore, the client's legal claim is in principle inadmissible. If, on the other hand, the complaint did allege a hidden defect in the repaired EPDM gutter lining, then a new expiration period did begin in 2018. In that case, the client is not empty-handed.
With this established case law in mind, we offer five tips to best handle restoration of a hidden defect and avoid the onset of a new term as much as possible:
As attorneys for business owners , we understand the importance of staying ahead. Together with us, you will have all the opportunities and risks in sight. Feel free to contact us and get personalized information about our services.