Political opportunities to improve the Work and Security Act

The Employment and Security Act is keeping the minds busy. Now that we have a new government, this is a good opportunity to take a look at the positions of the political parties. Because that something has to change is clear.

The Employment and Security Act was introduced in 2015 and it now appears that two of the Act's three objectives of fewer flexitime contracts and simpler dismissal law have not been achieved. The third objective, shorter unemployment benefits, has been achieved. Research by the Vereniging Arbeidsrecht attorneys Nederland (VAAN) among attorneys, judges and other legal practitioners confirms: the law leaves much room for discussion. Attempts to make the law more unambiguous appear so far to be doilies.

Key party points

But what is the best way to improve this law? That depends very much on one's political preference. For example, we see that the VVD wants to abolish the generally binding collective bargaining agreements. This gives companies much more freedom for customized contracts. D'66 makes a strong case for indefinite contracts. They even advocate the abolition of temporary contracts. The PvdA sees much advantage in a mandatory basic insurance for all self-employed workers. As you can see, these divergent views provide enough material for an evening of debate.

We defend your interests

Whatever the outcome of the election and however the Employment and Security Act is amended, we are here to defend your interests. For example, if you have questions about the current dismissal law or transitional compensation. Or if you have questions about temporary contracts in the event of company takeovers or reorganizations. Do you need more insight into the different positions of the political parties? Let us know!