In its Rendac and Amercentrale rulings, the Administrative Law Division of the Council of State (the Division) applied a new, stricter assessment framework for internal offsetting. As a result, a permit requirement applies to internal offsetting, even with retroactive effect to January 1, 2020. Furthermore, the Division has placed restrictions on the nitrogen space that may be used for internal offsetting, in part because of the introduction of the so-called "additionality requirement", which initially applied only to external offsetting. What does this case law - and specifically the December 18, 2024 ruling - mean for developers? Juuk Hulshof and Caspar Delissen explain.
Date: December 18, 2024
Modified December 19, 2024
Written by: Juuk Hulshof and Caspar Delissen
Reading time: +/- 3 minutes
Flowchart assessment framework internal netting:
When
According to established case law, the nitrogen deposition of the proposed project may be 'eliminated' (offset) against the nitrogen deposition of the existing 'reference situation' (e.g. the Logtsebaan ruling) during the 'pre-assessment', i.e. the assessment of whether a project may have significant effects and thus require a nature permit. If the preliminary assessment shows that there is no increase in nitrogen deposition, significant effects are excluded and the project does not require a nature permit.
Now
The aforementioned settled case law has since been updated. For the question of whether a project may have a significant impact, the deposition of the new project may no longer be offset against the deposition in the reference situation in the preliminary assessment. The preliminary assessment may only consider the new project in isolation, i.e. without including the existing situation. If the new project by itself may lead to significant impacts and netting is necessary to mitigate those impacts, a nature permit is required. In other words, internal netting is now subject to a permit requirement.
The rulings also tightened the requirements for the reference situation. This is now in line with the requirements that already applied to external balancing (which was always already subject to a permit). There is no difference in the new situation if the reference situation is based on a previously granted nature permit. In that case, the deposition permitted therein can still serve as the reference situation. If the reference situation is derived from an environmental permit (environmental licence, notification of Activities Decree or general rules), then netting is only possible with depositions from activities that are not only licensed, but also actually present. Structurally unused space in an environmental permit - for example, a licensed and reported but never realized industrial hall - is no longer part of the reference situation.
Following the 2019 PAS ruling, provinces established policy rules on how nature permits are granted. Those policy rules covered both internal and external netting. However, internal netting turned out not to require a permit, so the policy rules for that could be binned. With the decisions of the Division, those policy rules can be dusted off again. As is already the case with external offsetting, this means that provinces can skim off part of the emissions used for offsetting. For example, in connection with nature restoration: part of the emissions to the initiator and part to nature.
In line with this, the'additionality requirement' now also applies to internal offsetting. This means that before emissions are netted off, it must first be assessed whether these emissions should not already be terminated (surrendered) for nature restoration (as a so-called 'conservation measure' or 'appropriate measure').
In summary, then, the following is true:
For development practitioners, this means a greater chance of not being able to "round out" a project, as well as more administrative burdens and costs, and a greater chance of litigation with associated delays, now that third parties can pursue legal remedies against granted nature permits. But the poison cup is not yet empty.
The new assessment framework for internal netting applies directly, so not only to new projects but also to current applications, enforcement, objections and (higher) appeals.
It is advisable in such ongoing projects to take the flight to the front and assess the consequences of the amended assessment framework as soon as possible. A small windfall is that with the entry into force of the Environment Act, there is no longer a necessary link between building and nature permits (so-called "linkage requirement"). A procedure concerning only an environmental permit for construction (including OPA construction) will therefore not be killed. For BOPAs, however, this may be relevant in connection with the question of whether a development is possible in principle (feasibility test 'light').
In fact, it makes the change retroactive, to January 1, 2020. All activities commenced on or after Jan. 1, 2020 (construction/operation) and made possible with internal netting will be subject to retroactive licensing. This applies (probably) even if an activity has been granted a positive refusal. This means that all those (tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands) may be strictly illegal, as long as they have not been granted a nature permit as yet. For those cases, the Division has ruled that there is a five-year transition period during which no enforcement action can be taken against them.
Now the Netherlands finds itself with yet another nitrogen debacle. Not only the Division, but also the courts are now at a loss because "it can no longer be explained." For development practice, it is wise to identify the projects for which the change of course is relevant and then consider what is wise. In other words, these are projects:
These rulings have major practical implications. That's why our attorneys will be hosting an information session on January 16, 2025 to update you on the implications, whether the soup is indeed being eaten so hot, and to take you into space that does exist. Exact times and location will be shared later. So keep a close eye on our website and socials!
As attorneys for business owners , we understand the importance of staying ahead. Together with us, you will have all the opportunities and risks in sight. Feel free to contact our specialist attorneys and get personalized information about our services.